I tuned the filters visually, rather than trying to adjust them via the imager. Here are two more images to compare after that process:
PST-DS:
PST-SS:
The edge detail looks better in the SS, but much more detail is visible in the DS image.
The difference between SS and DS when using the scope visually is very apparent. Operating in DS mode, visual images have much more detail and contrast. The images don't capture this difference quite as well. However, for speed of comparison, the above images were smaller stacks (500 as opposed to 1000) and captured at 640 x 480 as opposed to 1280 x 720.
The trials, tribulations and small triumphs of a Charlotte, NC astronomer imaging under Bortle 8/9 skies.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
20 Hours of WR 134 with the Seestar S50
This image is a 20+ hour integration on WR 134, which is a highly energetic Wolf-Rayet star. The blue shockwave is oxygen ionized by the int...
-
I had a couple of emails asking how to defork an ETX telescope. The ETX 90 and ETX 125 were optically superb scopes, but the mounts left a...
-
M17, the Omega Nebula (among other names). M17 is one of the brightest and most massive stellar nurseries in the galaxy. The open cluster o...
-
The ZEQ25 doing its stuff on a cold night--imaging the Orion Nebula with an 8 inch f/4 astrograph. Note the lovely Christmas rug :) As ...


No comments:
Post a Comment