Friday, December 30, 2022

Mars on 12/25/2022

 The Christmas skies were clear this evening, but the cold wave that passed through Charlotte from the Midwest gave us very transparent but unstable skies. Mars was difficult to image; the planet appeared to be under rippling water, with surface details appearing and disappearing every few seconds. 


This image shows the planet with linear wavelet processing. I pushed the processing as far as I could to enhance albedo features, while trying to perserve a "natural" image of the planet. The visible features can be identified from the Mars map of the area (below).



Tuesday, December 20, 2022

Is More Better? Mars on 12/18/2022.

Seeing was below average this evening, but I decided to see if stacking significantly more images of Mars would produce a better picture than a large, but smaller number. The “lucky imaging” approach captures many frames at tens of frames per second. These frames are then stacked using packages such as AstroSurface, Registax, Autostakkert, etc,. Each of these packages ranks the captured frames by quality. The user then selects the percentage of the frames they wish to stack and process. However, the benefits of stacking decline as the number of frames increases. Stacking 1000 frames rather than 500 makes for a much higher quality image, but as the number of frames increases, the incremental improvement (i.e., the impact on the final image) shrinks.

The first image is from a large stack. I combined several AVIs captured sequentially to produce a large stack of almost 70,000 frames. I selected 45,000 frames for stacking. The second image is derived from 14,000 frames selected from a stack of 25,000 frames.

The differences between these images is subtle. The saturation of the first image (after color balancing), is a little more accurate. Moreover, subtle atmospheric limb clouds (the blue-white haze) are visible. These are missing from the second image. With more frames, I was able to back off wavelet adjustment and reduce the edge “rind” on the left limb of the planet. Achieving similar detail levels on the second image emphasized this rind.

My conclusion is that more is very subtly better. Would this conclusion be the case with a bigger aperture? I hope to test that out next year.

Images captured with a 5 inch Mak and Mallincam SkyRaider SLP.







Sunday, December 18, 2022

Jupiter on 12/17/2022

Seeing was slightly below average tonight after a cloudy day. Jupiter is close to its highest point in the sky by 6:30 local time, so it is ideally placed for imaging. 

The Great Red Spot (GRS) features prominently in this image. The GRS was likely discovered by Giovanni Cassini in 1665. This spot was observed until 1713, but then there is an observational gap of 118 years before it was again observed on September 5, 1831, with some 60 observations by 1879.. Since 1879 it has been continuously observed. 

There was a great deal of conjecture as to what the GRS was. We now know it is a massive, anticyclonic storm in Jupiter's atmosphere. If the early observations mentioned above are accurate, then it is a strom that has been raging for 357 years, with wind speeds as high as 432 km/h. 

More recently, in this century, the spot appears to be shrinking, with reports of the clouds at the edge shredding into the atmosphere. However, many astronomers believe the Spot's size is just a reflection of total cloud cover in the area, and not the actual size of the vortex that is creating it. The cloud shredding is, similarly, not related to the Spot. If this is the case, the Spot will be with us for many more years.

Mars with 5x Barlow on 12/17/2022

 Conditions tonight were better than yesterday and I decided to try some imaging with the 5x Barlow. This is a little crazy in the 125 mm f/15.3 Mak. The resulting focal ratio is f/76.5, for an effective focal length of 9,500 mm -- a little more than 31 feet!

The dim image meant I had to use a high gain setting to achieve a decent (47 fps) frame rate. Noise was high, but as I stacked about 13,000 of 26,000 captured frames, it was not an issue for the final image. The improved image size brings out some subtle detail on the disk which is missing on the 2x Barlow images.

Here is the Mars map for this image:



Mars on December 16, 2022

Despite less than average seeing, I imaged Mars twice tonight; once, when it was relatively low in the sky, and again when it was near the zenith. The images were passable, but definitely compromized by seeing. Before beginning the second imaging session, I had to clear dew off the scope corrector with a hairdryer. I've included Mars map comparisons for each image.


 



Jupiter on December 16, 20200

Conditions were a little more challenging for imaging tonight, with haze and dewing. Neverthess, I was able to get a usable image of Jupiter which shows some nice detail on the cloud belts. This image was taken with the 125mm Mak and 2x Barlow and the Mallincam Skyraider SLP. This image is from a stack of 15,000 images, with 12,000 stacked in AstroSurface; wavelets in Registax.

 

Thursday, December 15, 2022

Mars on 12/13/2022

Later the same evening I imaged Jupiter (last post), I also imaged Mars. The planet is close to the zenith around 9:30 local time here in Charlotte. Conditions were not as favorable as they were the last time I imaged the planet (I had to remove heavy dew from the corrector using a hair dryer), but I was able to capture a usable image using the 5 inch Mak and SLP imager (this is a stack of the best 40% of 15,000 frames).

Looking at the Mars map below the image, it’s not as easy to align the features with the map as it was in the previous image. Even early Mars observers noted that dust storms and weather on the Red Planet can make significant differences to surface features, and this appears to be the case with this image.



Nevertheless, some features identifiable: the north polar cap, and, at the top of the globe, Mare Sirenium, Mare Cimmerium, and Solis Lacus. The lighter, circular feature below center left is Amazonis, part of the Tharsis bulge, with its massive volcanoes, including Olympus Mons, the largest known volcano in the Solar System. Adjacent lighter areas,A rcadia, and Elysium, are also visible.

Many of these names originated from the observations of Percival Lowell. Lowell was a businessman, as well as a brilliant mathematician and avid astronomer. From 1893 to 1908, he studied Mars from his well-equipped private observatory in Flagstaff, AZ. Using his 24 inch Alvan Clark and Sons refractor, he noticed what he called “non-natural features” on the planet—the famous (or infamous) canals.


Lowell's canal map--1905

Lowell was consumed by the romantic vision of a mighty civilization struggling to survive as their planet slowly withered around them. The canals formed a vast transportation network, moving water from the polar regions to the dry deserts in temperate and equatorial regions. He also gave features on the planet romantic and evocative names (Arabia, Amazonis, Elysium, etc.), which created an exotic image of Mars in the popular imagination. The Barsoom novels of Edgar Rice Burroughs echoed this sentiment, while H.G. Wells explored its darker side in War of the Worlds.

But even in Lowell’s time, there were many who doubted the existence of the canals he so carefully mapped. The great astronomer E.M. Antoniadi reported seeing canals occasionally, but he believed they were an optical illusion caused by the brain joining up fleeting, fine details into linear features (I have, myself, seen linear features when visually observing Mars, only to have them break up into a complex of fine detail in moments of good seeing). Others criticized the whole idea of using open canals to transport water as preposterous, as evaporation would consume any water long before it reached lower latitudes. The overwhelming consensus was that the Martian climate was too hostile to support the development of complex life forms such as those Lowell envisaged. But despite this, the idea of a Mars with some sort of life persisted—I have a 1960s astronomy book which says the scientific consensus was that the dark areas on the planet were evidence of hardy, lichen-like plants.

The probe Mariner 4 put the final nail in the coffin of this belief. Its pictures showed a cratered, dry, moonlike world with an atmosphere far thinner than had been previously thought. However, these images resulted in an overcorrection of our perception of Mars. The track of the probe took imaged, by serendipity, the most moonlike areas of the planet. Future probes, such as the Viking landers, showed a much more Earth-like planet with bright skies and a landscape not unlike the US desert southwest.

Now, we know Mars is a dynamic world of winds and storms, of cratered plains and sand dunes. It is indeed an alien place, but our perception of it is still colored by the romantic imagination of Percival Lowell.

 

 

 

 

The Pelican Nebula with the Dwarf 3

This is a 4.5 hour integration of the Pelican Nebula, taken with a Dwarf 3 scope. Stacked and processed in Stellar Studio and Photoshop PS.