The issue is that I am working with a stack of only 3 images for a total of around 150 seconds of exposure--a very small amount of data. I did some more reprocessing of the image I posted earlier, reducing noise and manipulating levels. This is the new result. I think the center of the nebula is improved tremendously. The rather grainy nature of the outer area is caused by insufficient data due to the relatively short exposure time,
The trials, tribulations and small triumphs of a Charlotte, NC astronomer imaging under Bortle 8/9 skies.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Horsehead Nebula with the Dwarf 3
Here's an image of the Horsehead Nebula captured under my Bortle 8/9 skies. There's 2.38 hours of total integration time, captured i...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14a87/14a87851c9505fc4d4bc4ddd0454e015dc0b6a20" alt=""
-
I had a couple of emails asking how to defork an ETX telescope. The ETX 90 and ETX 125 were optically superb scopes, but the mounts left a...
-
The clouds melted away last night with a northerly breeze and a clear, transparent sky opened up. As it does not get dark until around 10...
-
Like the Ring Nebula, the Dumbbell nebula is a planetary nebula marking the end of a star's life as it puffs off its outer layers into s...
No comments:
Post a Comment