It's nice to see some activity on the sun--especially after this week's eclipse (I will have a longer post on that later)!
AR2672 and AR2671 have a slight chance (around 15%) of producing M-Class flares. None were visible in Ha when I took the image. Here is the white light image, taken with my 90mm Mak and DS2.3+. AR2672 is towards the center of the disk, AR2671 is at the edge. All images were processed in Autostakkert with wavelets in Registax 6.
Here is the Ha image, which shows some interesting detail around AR2672, as well as some dark, filamentary material. The uneven illumination is due to the etalons in the PST-DS:
The trials, tribulations and small triumphs of a Charlotte, NC astronomer imaging under Bortle 8/9 skies.
Thursday, August 24, 2017
Sunday, August 13, 2017
The Lagoon, Eagle, Trifid, and Omega Nebulas 8/12/2017
Last night, I had the honor of doing a public outreach stargazing event for Niches Land Trust. The location was a beautiful dark sky site about 20 minutes out of town.
I took my f/4 newt, ZEQ25 mount, and Mallincam 16C with me, plus my projector to show large, colorful images of DSOs to the attendees. The only issue was that the location demanded the use of a generator, which always makes me nervous! However, my little 1800W genny did the job very well for about 3 hours until the event ended.
With a public event, being able to capture images quickly is paramount. The binning mode of the DS16C enables rapid capture of DSOs with good resolution. Below are some of the images I captured. These are all 10-second integrations and are stacks of 10-15 images (except for the Trifid, which is a stack of just 5 images). Gain--and hence noise and amp glow--was high (20), but the images were fine for public consumption. Apart from a couple of histogram adjustments, these images are pretty much as captured with no dark field subtraction to reduce noise or amp glow.
For comparison, I've included a straight, unprocessed, raw capture (the second image below). It is interesting as the single image seems to show more detail (albeit with more noise) than the stack!
For comparison, I've included a straight, unprocessed, raw capture (the second image below). It is interesting as the single image seems to show more detail (albeit with more noise) than the stack!
As a bonus, we also got to see some very bright Perseids with a rate of about one per minute!
![]() |
Lagoon Nebula
Here is the single 10-second integration as captured:
|
![]() |
Eagle Nebula |
![]() |
Omega Nebula |
![]() |
Trifid Nebula |
Wednesday, August 9, 2017
A Celestial Crescent--Imaged 8-8-2017
I have never been able to image the Crescent Nebula; even under dark skies, the nebula did not show in any of my images. Last night, I hooked my Mallincam DS16C to my f/4 Newt astrograph and turned on a new feature--digital binning. Of course, there's nothing new about binning, but, up to now, that capability did not extend to CMOS-based imagers like the DS16C.
This addition adds huge sensitivity to an imager like the DS16C. At 2x2 binning, I was able to image the crescent at gain 15 with a 15-second integration, with a full moon in the sky close by and with no filtration! Here is a processed stack of 50 images:
A single, raw integration shows how sensitive the binned imager is:
This addition adds huge sensitivity to an imager like the DS16C. At 2x2 binning, I was able to image the crescent at gain 15 with a 15-second integration, with a full moon in the sky close by and with no filtration! Here is a processed stack of 50 images:
A single, raw integration shows how sensitive the binned imager is:
The Crescent is an emission nebula--it is the result of a shock wave from a Wolf-Rayet star (a rare, massive, and highly luminous star) slamming into a slower moving wind produced by the star when it became a red giant, more than a quarter of a million years ago. The star is WR136 or HD192163. In this astrometry.net analysis of the image, the star is shown towards the bottom of the crescent (the labels of the star and the NGC designation unfortunately over write each other).
AR2670--A Shadow of its Former Self 8/8/17
AR2670 continues to decay as it moves across the solar disk. It now has a stable magnetic field, which means it is unlikely to produce any flares. The plages around the spot are also fading as the whole area settles down. I also took and H-Alpha image, but it shows even less detail of this image and I have not posted it. In a few days, I suspect we will be looking at a featureless disk again as the sun moves into a deep minimum.
Thursday, August 3, 2017
AR2670 (formerly AR2665) in White Light and H-Alpha
AR2670 continues to decay. The white light image shows the spot and associated plages quite well, but the H-alpha image is rather disappointing, except for the interesting bright ring around the spot (which was faintly visible to the eye, but which imaging and processing brought out more prominently.
White light images were taken with a 90mm MAK and solar filter, H-alpha with a PST-DS. The imager was a Mallincam DS2.3+ . Both H-alpha and white light images are stacks of 100 frames from 200-frame .ser files, stacked and processed in Registax.
White light images were taken with a 90mm MAK and solar filter, H-alpha with a PST-DS. The imager was a Mallincam DS2.3+ . Both H-alpha and white light images are stacks of 100 frames from 200-frame .ser files, stacked and processed in Registax.
![]() |
White light image |
![]() |
H-alpha image |
Wednesday, August 2, 2017
Xterminator II Elongated Stars Fixed!
I was able to try out Rock Mallin's suggestions for fixing elongated stars in Xterminator II images. This fix involved setting the camera firmware from the camera itself. However, if I had realized that I could upload firmware settings from the imaging software I was using ( Miloslick), the fix probably would have worked the first time. Here are a few imaging stacks from that imaging session--these are all sub 8-second integrations. Note how deep even short exposures can take you with the Xterminator II, as witnessed in the the M101 Astrometry.net image.
AR2665 Returns (8-2-17)!
AR2665 has returned and is likely to be renamed AR2670. It appears to be significantly decayed from its huge self during its first transit. This image was taken between clouds in poor seeing. Note the plages (bright spots) surrounding AR2665 in this image. Plages are magnetic features in the photosphere associated with sun spots.
Imaged with ETX 90 and Mallicam DS 2.3+. Stacked in autostakkert with wavelets in Registax. 150 of 300 frames stacked.
Imaged with ETX 90 and Mallicam DS 2.3+. Stacked in autostakkert with wavelets in Registax. 150 of 300 frames stacked.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The Lagoon Nebula with the Seestar S50
This is probably the best image of the Lagoon Nebula I have ever taken. The Lagoon is a tough object for me as my southern horizon is mostly...

-
I had a couple of emails asking how to defork an ETX telescope. The ETX 90 and ETX 125 were optically superb scopes, but the mounts left a...
-
The ZEQ25 doing its stuff on a cold night--imaging the Orion Nebula with an 8 inch f/4 astrograph. Note the lovely Christmas rug :) As ...
-
One of the great things about being a part of an online community of people with similar interests is that you learn a lot from people who a...